View source for 'Repugnant' online discussions are not illegal thoughtcrime, court rules

Fantasizing online about kidnapping, sexually abusing, and eating women does not amount to unlawful conduct or thoughtcrime, a US federal appeals court ruled. A person's "inclinations and fantasies are his own and beyond the reach of the government," 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Barrington Parker wrote Thursday in the criminal case of Gilberto Valle, dubbed the New York City "cannibal cop."<br>
<br>
"We are loath to give the government power to punish us for our thoughts and not our actions," Barrington ruled. "That includes the power to criminalize an individual's expression of sexual fantasies, no matter how perverse or disturbing."<br>
<br>
<i>source: Article < "Repugnant" online discussions are not illegal thoughtcrime, court rules > by David Kravets; arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/12/repugnant-online-discussions-are-not-illegal-thoughtcrime-court-rules/; Ars Technica; 4 December 2015</i>

[[Category:David Kravets]]
[[Category:USA]]
[[Category:Barrington Parker]]
[[Category:Judges]]
[[Category:Rechters]]
[[Category:Thought crime]]
[[Category:Gedachtenpolitie]]
[[Category:Gilberto Valle]]
[[Category:Sexual fantasies]]
[[Category:Seksuele fantasieën‏‎]]