Sexual citizenship and human rights - Revision history

Admin at 23:15, 1 April 2017

2017-04-01T23:15:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 1 April 2017
Line 202:		Line 202:
	With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law<br></small>		With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law<br></small>
	<br>		<br>
	<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/ european_studies/events/past- conferences/sexual-citizenship-and- human-rights/agenda.php; Videos conference: www.youtube.com/user/utCES?feature=watch; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>		<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/european_studies/events/past-conferences/sexual-citizenship-and-human-rights/agenda.php; Videos conference: www.youtube.com/user/utCES?feature=watch; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>

	[[Category:University of Texas at Austin]]		[[Category:University of Texas at Austin]]

Admin at 10:35, 1 June 2016

2016-06-01T10:35:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 1 June 2016
Line 253:		Line 253:
	[[Category:Treatment]]		[[Category:Treatment]]
	[[Category:Behandeling]]		[[Category:Behandeling]]
	[[Category:~~Transsexuals]]~~		[[Category:T&T]]
	~~[[Category:Transseksuelen~~]]
	[[Category:USA]]		[[Category:USA]]
	[[Category:Poland]]		[[Category:Poland]]

Admin at 14:26, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:26:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 2 February 2014
Line 199:		Line 199:
	The Free on-line dictionary defines "treatment" as "the care and management of a patient to combat, ameliorate, or prevent a disease, disorder, or injury." A synonym that is offered is "therapy." The term "sex offender treatment" therefore, suggests that the sex offenders are being offered a form of psychotherapy. Drawing on my own experience, both as a sex offender who has been through "treatment" and as a mental health professional (MSW) I would suggest that the corrective procedures to which I have been subjected are not treatment at all, but a form of law-enforcement that exacerbates rather than ameliorates the presumed disorder that it purports to "treat." This claim will be explored in relation to the following generally accepted principles of psychotherapy: (1). The need for clarity with regard to who the client is. (2). The central importance of careful listening. (3). The thoughtful and appropriate use of individual and social narratives. (4). The importance of facilitating social integration and adjustment. (5). Enhancing self-esteem. (6). Respect for boundaries.(7). Simple honesty. Finally I will very briefly suggest some of the elements that might be important if sex-offender treatment were to actually become a form of therapy.<br>		The Free on-line dictionary defines "treatment" as "the care and management of a patient to combat, ameliorate, or prevent a disease, disorder, or injury." A synonym that is offered is "therapy." The term "sex offender treatment" therefore, suggests that the sex offenders are being offered a form of psychotherapy. Drawing on my own experience, both as a sex offender who has been through "treatment" and as a mental health professional (MSW) I would suggest that the corrective procedures to which I have been subjected are not treatment at all, but a form of law-enforcement that exacerbates rather than ameliorates the presumed disorder that it purports to "treat." This claim will be explored in relation to the following generally accepted principles of psychotherapy: (1). The need for clarity with regard to who the client is. (2). The central importance of careful listening. (3). The thoughtful and appropriate use of individual and social narratives. (4). The importance of facilitating social integration and adjustment. (5). Enhancing self-esteem. (6). Respect for boundaries.(7). Simple honesty. Finally I will very briefly suggest some of the elements that might be important if sex-offender treatment were to actually become a form of therapy.<br>
	<br>		<br>
	<i>Sponsored by the Center for European Studies, the European Union Center of Excellence, the European Union, the William A. Percy Foundation for Social and Historical Studies, the Department of Germanic Studies, and the Swedish Endowment<br>		<small>Sponsored by the Center for European Studies, the European Union Center of Excellence, the European Union, the William A. Percy Foundation for Social and Historical Studies, the Department of Germanic Studies, and the Swedish Endowment<br>
	With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law</i><br>		With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law<br></small>
	<br>		<br>
	<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/ european_studies/events/past- conferences/sexual-citizenship-and- human-rights/agenda.php; Videos conference: www.youtube.com/user/utCES?feature=watch; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>		<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/ european_studies/events/past- conferences/sexual-citizenship-and- human-rights/agenda.php; Videos conference: www.youtube.com/user/utCES?feature=watch; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>

Admin at 14:19, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:19:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 2 February 2014
Line 206:		Line 206:
	[[Category:University of Texas at Austin]]		[[Category:University of Texas at Austin]]
	[[Category:Douglas Biow]]		[[Category:Douglas Biow]]
	[[Category:Thomas Hubbard]]		[[Category:Thomas K. Hubbard]]
	[[Category:Helmut Graupner]]		[[Category:Helmut Graupner]]
	[[Category:Rosemary Auchmuty]]		[[Category:Rosemary Auchmuty]]
Line 238:		Line 238:
	[[Category:Matthew Ferrara]]		[[Category:Matthew Ferrara]]
	[[Category:Bill Andriette]]		[[Category:Bill Andriette]]
	[[Category:Fred S. Berlin]]		[[Category:Fred Berlin]]
	[[Category:Jules Mulder]]		[[Category:Jules Mulder]]
	[[Category:James Hunter]]		[[Category:James Hunter]]

Admin at 14:15, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:15:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 2 February 2014
Line 248:		Line 248:
	[[Category:Zedendelinquenten]]		[[Category:Zedendelinquenten]]
	[[Category:Sex offender registries]]		[[Category:Sex offender registries]]
	[[Category:Lijsten van ~~zedenwetovertreders~~]]		[[Category:Lijsten van zedenwetsovertreders]]
	[[Category:Marriage also for gay people]]		[[Category:Marriage also for gay people]]
	[[Category:Huwelijk ook voor homoseksuelen]]		[[Category:Huwelijk ook voor homoseksuelen]]

Admin at 14:15, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:15:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 2 February 2014
Line 202:		Line 202:
	With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law</i><br>		With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law</i><br>
	<br>		<br>
	<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>		<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/ european_studies/events/past- conferences/sexual-citizenship-and- human-rights/agenda.php; Videos conference: www.youtube.com/user/utCES?feature=watch; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>

	[[Category:University of Texas at Austin]]		[[Category:University of Texas at Austin]]

Admin at 14:13, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:13:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:13, 2 February 2014
Line 46:		Line 46:
	<br>		<br>
	<b>8:00-9:20 p.m. Session Two: Transgender Rights</b><br>		<b>8:00-9:20 p.m. Session Two: Transgender Rights</b><br>
	~~<br>~~
	Moderator: <b>Richard Schott</b>, Professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs, UT Austin<br>		Moderator: <b>Richard Schott</b>, Professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs, UT Austin<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 62:		Line 61:
	<br>		<br>
	<b>9:00-11:00 a.m. Session Three: Anti-Discrimination</b><br>		<b>9:00-11:00 a.m. Session Three: Anti-Discrimination</b><br>
	~~<br>~~
	Moderator: <b>Karen Engle</b>, Professor, School of Law, UT Austin, Minerva House Drysdale Regents Chair<br>		Moderator: <b>Karen Engle</b>, Professor, School of Law, UT Austin, Minerva House Drysdale Regents Chair<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 90:		Line 88:
	<br>		<br>
	<b>11:15-1:15 p.m. Session Four: Youth Sexual Rights</b><br>		<b>11:15-1:15 p.m. Session Four: Youth Sexual Rights</b><br>

	Moderator: Thomas Hubbard<br>		Moderator: Thomas Hubbard<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 116:		Line 113:
	<br>		<br>
	<b>2:15-5:00 p.m. Session Five: Pornography and Children</b><br>		<b>2:15-5:00 p.m. Session Five: Pornography and Children</b><br>
	~~<br>~~
	Moderator: <b>Sabine Hake</b>, Professor, Department of Germanic Studies, UT Austin; Center for Women's and Gender Studies; Department of Geography and the Environment; Texas Chair of German Literature and Culture<br>		Moderator: <b>Sabine Hake</b>, Professor, Department of Germanic Studies, UT Austin; Center for Women's and Gender Studies; Department of Geography and the Environment; Texas Chair of German Literature and Culture<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 142:		Line 138:
	<br>		<br>
	<b>5:15-7:00 p.m. Session Six: Sex Work, Migration, And Trafficking</b><br>		<b>5:15-7:00 p.m. Session Six: Sex Work, Migration, And Trafficking</b><br>
	~~<br>~~
	Moderator: <b>Gloria Gonzalez-Lopez</b>, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, UT Austin; Center for Mexican American Studies<br>		Moderator: <b>Gloria Gonzalez-Lopez</b>, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, UT Austin; Center for Mexican American Studies<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 162:		Line 157:
	<br>		<br>
	<b>9:00-11:00 a.m. Session Seven: Do Sex Offenders Have Human Rights?</b><br>		<b>9:00-11:00 a.m. Session Seven: Do Sex Offenders Have Human Rights?</b><br>
	~~<br>~~
	Moderator: <b>Thomas Hubbard</b><br>		Moderator: <b>Thomas Hubbard</b><br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 188:		Line 182:
	<br>		<br>
	<b>11:15-1:15 p.m. Session Eight: Therapeutic Approaches to Sex Offending</b><br>		<b>11:15-1:15 p.m. Session Eight: Therapeutic Approaches to Sex Offending</b><br>
	~~<br>~~
	Moderator: <b>Thomas Hubbard</b><br>		Moderator: <b>Thomas Hubbard</b><br>
	<br>		<br>

Admin at 14:11, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:11:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 2 February 2014
Line 98:		Line 98:
	What is the figure of the ghostly "gay" child? How has it been changing, conceptually and politically, in our current century? Has its ghostly specificity subsided? Is the trans-child a more distinct entity with a different relation to "consent"? Is the judiciary in the U.S. starting to imagine children's right to queerness and what would this mean for sexual childhood? Engaging these questions, this talk speculates on something that's been surfacing in Anglo American public culture over the last eight years or so. A future the public fears is coming—child sexuality—evidenced by sexting, "gay" kids in middle school, and sexual bullying —is now accompanying exportation of a fading child (the figure of the innocent child) to other lands, where it seems available to be rediscovered. Quite paradoxically, aesthetics of world documentaries on the-child-in-peril-in-the-third-world (a genre enjoying conspicuous success on the art-film circuit in the U.S.) may be "restoring" the Western-style innocent child through, of all things, the sexualized, racialized, HIV child. What explains this odd development? Moreover, how does literature, especially experimental literary form, run against this fray? These are the questions explored by this talk.<br>		What is the figure of the ghostly "gay" child? How has it been changing, conceptually and politically, in our current century? Has its ghostly specificity subsided? Is the trans-child a more distinct entity with a different relation to "consent"? Is the judiciary in the U.S. starting to imagine children's right to queerness and what would this mean for sexual childhood? Engaging these questions, this talk speculates on something that's been surfacing in Anglo American public culture over the last eight years or so. A future the public fears is coming—child sexuality—evidenced by sexting, "gay" kids in middle school, and sexual bullying —is now accompanying exportation of a fading child (the figure of the innocent child) to other lands, where it seems available to be rediscovered. Quite paradoxically, aesthetics of world documentaries on the-child-in-peril-in-the-third-world (a genre enjoying conspicuous success on the art-film circuit in the U.S.) may be "restoring" the Western-style innocent child through, of all things, the sexualized, racialized, HIV child. What explains this odd development? Moreover, how does literature, especially experimental literary form, run against this fray? These are the questions explored by this talk.<br>
	<br>		<br>
	<b>Gert Hekma</b><br>		<b>Gert Hekma</b> [Due to illness Hekma was not present; his text was read by someone else though.]<br>
	<b>"Sexual Rights for Youngsters and the Fight for Their Self-determination in the Netherlands Since the 1950s"</b><br>		<b>"Sexual Rights for Youngsters and the Fight for Their Self-determination in the Netherlands Since the 1950s"</b><br>
	(25 min.)<br>		(25 min.)<br>
Line 205:		Line 205:
	(20 min.)<br>		(20 min.)<br>
	The Free on-line dictionary defines "treatment" as "the care and management of a patient to combat, ameliorate, or prevent a disease, disorder, or injury." A synonym that is offered is "therapy." The term "sex offender treatment" therefore, suggests that the sex offenders are being offered a form of psychotherapy. Drawing on my own experience, both as a sex offender who has been through "treatment" and as a mental health professional (MSW) I would suggest that the corrective procedures to which I have been subjected are not treatment at all, but a form of law-enforcement that exacerbates rather than ameliorates the presumed disorder that it purports to "treat." This claim will be explored in relation to the following generally accepted principles of psychotherapy: (1). The need for clarity with regard to who the client is. (2). The central importance of careful listening. (3). The thoughtful and appropriate use of individual and social narratives. (4). The importance of facilitating social integration and adjustment. (5). Enhancing self-esteem. (6). Respect for boundaries.(7). Simple honesty. Finally I will very briefly suggest some of the elements that might be important if sex-offender treatment were to actually become a form of therapy.<br>		The Free on-line dictionary defines "treatment" as "the care and management of a patient to combat, ameliorate, or prevent a disease, disorder, or injury." A synonym that is offered is "therapy." The term "sex offender treatment" therefore, suggests that the sex offenders are being offered a form of psychotherapy. Drawing on my own experience, both as a sex offender who has been through "treatment" and as a mental health professional (MSW) I would suggest that the corrective procedures to which I have been subjected are not treatment at all, but a form of law-enforcement that exacerbates rather than ameliorates the presumed disorder that it purports to "treat." This claim will be explored in relation to the following generally accepted principles of psychotherapy: (1). The need for clarity with regard to who the client is. (2). The central importance of careful listening. (3). The thoughtful and appropriate use of individual and social narratives. (4). The importance of facilitating social integration and adjustment. (5). Enhancing self-esteem. (6). Respect for boundaries.(7). Simple honesty. Finally I will very briefly suggest some of the elements that might be important if sex-offender treatment were to actually become a form of therapy.<br>
	Sponsored by the Center for European Studies, the European Union Center of Excellence, the European Union, the William A. Percy Foundation for Social and Historical Studies, the Department of Germanic Studies, and the Swedish Endowment<br>		<br>
	With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law<br>		<i>Sponsored by the Center for European Studies, the European Union Center of Excellence, the European Union, the William A. Percy Foundation for Social and Historical Studies, the Department of Germanic Studies, and the Swedish Endowment<br>
			With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law</i><br>
	<br>		<br>
	<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>		<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>

Admin at 14:08, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:08:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 2 February 2014
Line 27:		Line 27:
	(45 min.)<br>		(45 min.)<br>
	With the right to individual application and the binding force of judgments the European Court of Human Rights became the most powerful international human rights tribunal making the European Convention of Human Rights the world´s most effective human rights treaty. During the past 30 years the Court has been developing the by far most comprehensive and most progressive case-law on sexual orientation among international judicial bodies. This presentation will provide an overview on this case-law by the Court competent for over 800 million people, from criminalization in the beginning to marriage- and family-issues these days.<br>		With the right to individual application and the binding force of judgments the European Court of Human Rights became the most powerful international human rights tribunal making the European Convention of Human Rights the world´s most effective human rights treaty. During the past 30 years the Court has been developing the by far most comprehensive and most progressive case-law on sexual orientation among international judicial bodies. This presentation will provide an overview on this case-law by the Court competent for over 800 million people, from criminalization in the beginning to marriage- and family-issues these days.<br>
			<br>
	<b>Rosemary Auchmuty</b><br>		<b>Rosemary Auchmuty</b><br>
	<b>"Three Cheers for Equality! But Don't Forget that Marriage is about Money"</b><br>		<b>"Three Cheers for Equality! But Don't Forget that Marriage is about Money"</b><br>
	(30 min.)<br>		(30 min.)<br>
	The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 received royal assent on 17 July 2013 and is expected to come into force in England and Wales in the summer of 2014. There was very little lobbying for it – even Stonewall, the gay pressure group, was uninterested – and the Act, supported by all three main political parties, passed with very little fuss or notice. What media attention it received focused on issues of equality and the struggle against homophobia; the legal consequences of marriage were largely ignored, as they had been when the Civil Partnership Act 2004 was passed. Though the CPA conferred identical rights, the conservative appeal of the word 'marriage' ensured that advocates would not stop until they had won the status in name as well as in fact. Yet heterosexual marriage has been in long-term decline in the UK for decades, as in all western countries. It has been argued that one reason for this has been women's increased economic power, with the availability of alternative means of support making marriage to a breadwinning husband less essential and, therefore, less likely. Indeed, the reciprocity of marital support obligations on divorce has made it financially disadvantageous for women at both ends of the wealth spectrum to formalise relationships with dependent men. The absence of a gendered power dynamic in same-sex relationships has led some advocates of same-sex marriage to present the institution as a new, equality-based model for all marriages. Such a representation ignores the profound, historical and continuing economic basis of marriage and the fact that protection of an economically weaker partner lies at the heart of our marriage laws. It is only on the ending of a relationship that the true effects of legal regulation become clear. Interviews conducted with people who have dissolved their civil partnership reveal that, for those with property to dispute over, the court's discretion on dissolution to override previously agreed arrangements or understandings often comes as an expensive surprise, particularly when the judge is influenced by heterosexual models of marriage. This paper will explore the effects that ignorance or greater understanding of the economic effects of legal regulation might have on decisions made by same-sex couples, and will make some predictions about the future of same-sex marriage and the civil partnership in England.<br>		The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 received royal assent on 17 July 2013 and is expected to come into force in England and Wales in the summer of 2014. There was very little lobbying for it – even Stonewall, the gay pressure group, was uninterested – and the Act, supported by all three main political parties, passed with very little fuss or notice. What media attention it received focused on issues of equality and the struggle against homophobia; the legal consequences of marriage were largely ignored, as they had been when the Civil Partnership Act 2004 was passed. Though the CPA conferred identical rights, the conservative appeal of the word 'marriage' ensured that advocates would not stop until they had won the status in name as well as in fact. Yet heterosexual marriage has been in long-term decline in the UK for decades, as in all western countries. It has been argued that one reason for this has been women's increased economic power, with the availability of alternative means of support making marriage to a breadwinning husband less essential and, therefore, less likely. Indeed, the reciprocity of marital support obligations on divorce has made it financially disadvantageous for women at both ends of the wealth spectrum to formalise relationships with dependent men. The absence of a gendered power dynamic in same-sex relationships has led some advocates of same-sex marriage to present the institution as a new, equality-based model for all marriages. Such a representation ignores the profound, historical and continuing economic basis of marriage and the fact that protection of an economically weaker partner lies at the heart of our marriage laws. It is only on the ending of a relationship that the true effects of legal regulation become clear. Interviews conducted with people who have dissolved their civil partnership reveal that, for those with property to dispute over, the court's discretion on dissolution to override previously agreed arrangements or understandings often comes as an expensive surprise, particularly when the judge is influenced by heterosexual models of marriage. This paper will explore the effects that ignorance or greater understanding of the economic effects of legal regulation might have on decisions made by same-sex couples, and will make some predictions about the future of same-sex marriage and the civil partnership in England.<br>
	Daniel Williams<br>		<br>
	"The Law and Public Opinion on the Freedom to Marry in Texas 1997-2013"<br>		<b>Daniel Williams</b><br>
			<b>"The Law and Public Opinion on the Freedom to Marry in Texas 1997-2013"</b><br>
	(20 min.)<br>		(20 min.)<br>
	Before 1997 only practice prohibited two people of the same sex from marrying in Texas. Since then rule, statute, court precedent and event the State Constitution have changed creating what can seem like an insurmountable barrier to the freedom to marry. At the same time public opinion has shifted dramatically. Where once the law was silent and public opinion was almost universally opposed to same-sex marriage. Now the law is vocal and the majority of Texans support some form of legal recognition for same-sex relationships. "The Law and Public Opinion on the Freedom to Marry in Texas 1997-2013" walks, step by step, through these cultural and legal shifts and demonstrates how they interact with each other.<br>		Before 1997 only practice prohibited two people of the same sex from marrying in Texas. Since then rule, statute, court precedent and event the State Constitution have changed creating what can seem like an insurmountable barrier to the freedom to marry. At the same time public opinion has shifted dramatically. Where once the law was silent and public opinion was almost universally opposed to same-sex marriage. Now the law is vocal and the majority of Texans support some form of legal recognition for same-sex relationships. "The Law and Public Opinion on the Freedom to Marry in Texas 1997-2013" walks, step by step, through these cultural and legal shifts and demonstrates how they interact with each other.<br>
			<br>
	<b>Yasmin Nair</b><br>		<b>Yasmin Nair</b><br>
	<b>"Neoliberalism and Gay Marriage"</b><br>		<b>"Neoliberalism and Gay Marriage"</b><br>
	(20 min.)<br>		(20 min.)<br>
	The United States is set to recognize Gay Marriage in all states, possibly in five years or less. This is being hailed as nothing less than an end to "second-class citizenship" for gay citizens and the end of a form of inequality. This presentation will demonstrate, through historical details and analysis, that, in fact, Gay Marriage in the US (and elsewhere) is a sign of the triumph of neoliberalism, particularly in its shoring up on of a privatized state where resources and even life-saving benefits like healthcare are now only available through the contractual obligations established by filial and marital relations.		The United States is set to recognize Gay Marriage in all states, possibly in five years or less. This is being hailed as nothing less than an end to "second-class citizenship" for gay citizens and the end of a form of inequality. This presentation will demonstrate, through historical details and analysis, that, in fact, Gay Marriage in the US (and elsewhere) is a sign of the triumph of neoliberalism, particularly in its shoring up on of a privatized state where resources and even life-saving benefits like healthcare are now only available through the contractual obligations established by filial and marital relations.<br>
			<br>
	<b>6:30-8:00 p.m. Reception, Buffet, and Cash Bar</b><br>		<b>6:30-8:00 p.m. Reception, Buffet, and Cash Bar</b><br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 155:		Line 159:
	(30 min.)<br>		(30 min.)<br>
	<br>		<br>
	<u><b>Sunday, November 24</u></b><br>		<u><b>Sunday, November 24</b></u><br>
	<br>		<br>
	<b>9:00-11:00 a.m. Session Seven: Do Sex Offenders Have Human Rights?</b><br>		<b>9:00-11:00 a.m. Session Seven: Do Sex Offenders Have Human Rights?</b><br>

Admin at 14:04, 2 February 2014

2014-02-02T14:04:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 2 February 2014
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Professor, Department of Classics, UT Austin; Fellow of Mary Helen Thompson Centennial Proffesorship in the Humanities<br>		Professor, Department of Classics, UT Austin; Fellow of Mary Helen Thompson Centennial Proffesorship in the Humanities<br>
	<br>		<br>
	<b>4:15-6:30 p.m. Session One: Same-Sex Marriage and Family<b><br>		<b>4:15-6:30 p.m. Session One: Same-Sex Marriage and Family</b><br>
	Moderator: Thomas Hubbard<br>		Moderator: Thomas Hubbard<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 204:		Line 204:
	With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law<br>		With assistance from the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, the Center for Women's and Gender Studies, the Institute for Historical Studies, OUTLaw, and the Texas Journal of Women and the Law<br>
	<br>		<br>
	<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; Conference University of Texas; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>		<i>source: 'Sexual Citizenship and Human Rights: What Can the US Learn from the EU and European Law?'; Conference University of Texas at Austin; 22, 23 & 24 November 2013</i>

	[[Category:]]		[[Category:University of Texas at Austin]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Douglas Biow]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Thomas Hubbard]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Helmut Graupner]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Rosemary Auchmuty]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Daniel Williams]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Yasmin Nair]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Richard Schott]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Carla LaGata]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Carsten Balzer]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Phyllis Randolph Frye]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Karen Engle]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Hans Ytterberg]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Krzysztof Smiszek]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Nathan Berg]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Donald Lien]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Ryan H. Nelson]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Kathryn Bond Stockton]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Gert Hekma]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Florian Mildenberger]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Robert Teixeira]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Sabine Hake]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Helmut Graupner]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Alisdair A. Gillespie]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:William Thompson]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Kurt Starke]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Gloria Gonzalez-Lopez]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Laura Agustín]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Noel Busch-Armendariz]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Janet Halley]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Yasmin Nair]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Mary Sue Molnar]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Matthew Ferrara]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Bill Andriette]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Fred S. Berlin]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Jules Mulder]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:James Hunter]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Child pornography]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Kinderporno]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Discrimination]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Discriminatie]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Sex offenders]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Zedendelinquenten]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Sex offender registries]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Lijsten van zedenwetovertreders]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Marriage also for gay people]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Huwelijk ook voor homoseksuelen]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Treatment]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Behandeling]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Transsexuals]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Transseksuelen]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:USA]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Poland]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Polen]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Queer]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Germany]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Duitsland]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Canada]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:EU]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Human rights]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Mensenrechten]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Prostitution]]
	[[Category:]]		[[Category:Prostitutie]]
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:]]~~
	~~[[Category:~~]]