2013 english: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [[Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate]] - (Global News, 1 March 2013) | |||
* [[Should people who look at child porn go to prison for thousands of years?]] - Text by Jacob Sullum (Reason.com, 22 February 2013) | * [[Should people who look at child porn go to prison for thousands of years?]] - Text by Jacob Sullum (Reason.com, 22 February 2013) | ||
* [[Man could face 3,000-year jail sentence in child pornography case]] - Text by Sade M. Gordon (wptv.com, 21 February 2013) | * [[Man could face 3,000-year jail sentence in child pornography case]] - Text by Sade M. Gordon (wptv.com, 21 February 2013) | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 2 March 2013
| Back in time | Index |
- Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate - (Global News, 1 March 2013)
- Should people who look at child porn go to prison for thousands of years? - Text by Jacob Sullum (Reason.com, 22 February 2013)
- Man could face 3,000-year jail sentence in child pornography case - Text by Sade M. Gordon (wptv.com, 21 February 2013)
- Review short movie: Gisberta (2009) - (Milkboys, 6 February 2013)
- David Icke: from harmless nutter to dangerous menace - Text by Tom O'Carroll (Heretic TOC, 4 February 2013)
- Ian Rankin of the Labour Party caught with child porn - (Sovereign Independent UK, 5 January 2013)
- No full academic consensus on whether consensual paedophilic relations necessarily cause harm - Text by Jon Henley (The Guardian, 3 January 2013)