Why possession of child porn must be re-legalised: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:Sweden]] | [[Category:Sweden]] | ||
[[Category:Zweden]] | [[Category:Zweden]] | ||
[[Category:Swedish | [[Category:Swedish Union of Journalists (SJF)]] |
Latest revision as of 12:20, 12 June 2017
Remember that possession of child pornography was legal in most parts of the world until just a decade or so ago (1999 in Sweden). The Swedish Association of Journalists still is against the ban. That's why Falkvinge makes a point of using the word "re-legalize" instead of "legalize".
source: Article 'Why possession of child porn must be re-legalised'; destroyerjournal.com/2012/09/10/why-possession-of-child-porn-must-be-re-legalised/; Destroyer Journal; 10 September 2012